The Contra Costa County Grand Jury has recently released 6 reports on various topics around Contra Costa County. Compliance and Continuity Report: We reviewed responses to 96 findings and 45…
The post Contra Costa County Grand Jury Releases 6 Reports appeared first on Contra Costa News.
The Contra Costa County Grand Jury has recently released 6 reports on various topics around Contra Costa County.
Compliance and Continuity Report:
We reviewed responses to 96 findings and 45 recommendations in the 2024-2025 Grand Jury reports from seven agencies. All responses were on time. Of the responses, 55 (57%) agreed with the findings, 21 (22%) partially disagreed, and 20 (21%) disagreed. Of the recommendations, 17 (38%) have been implemented, eight (18%) will be implemented, one (2%) requires further analysis, and 19 (42%) will not be implemented.
Agencies include:
Richmond City Council
Mosquito Vector and Control Board
City of Clayton
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors.
Diablo Unified School District
Contra Costa County’s Internal Audit Division: Time for a Transformation
Direct the IAD to comply with professional auditing standards
Establish a dedicated Audit Committee with consolidated oversight responsibility, appropriate expertise, and public membership
Require the development and Board approval of a formal audit charter
Mandate a documented risk-based audit planning process with prospective Board approval
Direct the IAD to undergo an external quality assessment and establish an ongoing quality assurance program
BART Office of Inspector General: Independence Delayed is Independence Denied
Made a series of recommendations to create a written policy on Office of Inspector General authority and create several other policies.
Pinole’s Financial Future: It’s a Rough Road
Pinole staff that projected annual operating fund deficits starting at $700,000 in Fiscal Year 2026/27. These deficits are projected to grow to $5.6 million in Fiscal Year 2030/31. Meanwhile, Pinole’s unfunded pension liability has grown to approximately $45 million, and its unfunded retiree healthcare liability is approximately $35 million. Pinole also has road rehabilitation and other deteriorating infrastructure that will cost an estimated additional $60 million to eventually repair or replace. Recommendations include:
When developing all future Operating Budgets, the Council should comply with Pinole’s “Financial and Investment Policies” that require a structurally balanced annual budget.
During all future budget development cycles, the Council should consider directing staff to prepare an Operating Budget that includes expenditure reductions so that expenditures match revenues in each budget cycle.
By Fiscal Year 2027/28, the Council should consider adopting a formal long-term financial plan that incorporates the level of expenditure reductions as outlined in the 2024 Baker Tilly Report.
By December 31, 2026, the Council should consider developing methods to engage Pinole residents regarding options to address ongoing fiscal challenges.
By June 30, 2027, the Council should consider developing a plan to fund and reconstruct Pinole’s public roads.
By March 31, 2027, the Council should consider directing staff to review funding options, such as asset sales, to address Pinole’s unfunded pension liability.
Electronic Home Detention
The Custody Alternative Facility (CAF) is managed by the Sheriff’s Office. In 2025, 801 adults in Contra Costa County were enrolled in external monitoring by “ankle bracelet,” either EHD or an ankle bracelet that monitors alcohol level. Although 77% of CAF clients complete their sentences or comply with court-ordered appearances, the Grand Jury identified room for improvement with respect to how EHD is administered, particularly regarding appeals and data collection. In 2025, the Average Daily Population (ADP) of CAF (including all three segments) was 651. The cumulative ADP for the detention facilities (MDF, WCDF, and MCDF) was 957, meaning that 40% of people in custody in the County are being monitored or serving their time through CAF. Frequency of home visits is determined by the nature of the charges:
Violent charges (e.g., robbery, firearm offenses): Once per week (4 times per month)
Non-violent felony charges (e.g., burglary, theft, hit-and-run): Twice per month
Misdemeanors (e.g., DUI): Once per month
RECOMMENDATIONS
R1. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider revising the administrative policy for EHD to include an explanation of the right to appeal under California Penal Codes Sections 1203.018 and 1203.016.
R2. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider directing CAF to send a post- sentencing “Notice of Disqualification” to the address of the last known attorney of record in addition to the notice mailed to the denied participant.
R3. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider collecting and publishing demographic information on denials or disqualifications for all three CAF programs.
R4. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider collecting and publishing reasons for denials or disqualifications for all three CAF programs.
R5. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider collecting and publishing rates of recidivism for EHD participants.
R6. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider collecting and publishing separate cost data for each of the CAF programs.
R7. By December 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider translating all documents used by individuals in the CAF process into Spanish and Mandarin
The Cost of Adult Detention Facilities
In 2025, the Average Daily Population (ADP) of the jails operated by Contra Costa County was less than 50% of capacity. Staffing the facilities and providing the physical and mental health resources required by the incarcerated population in 2025 resulted in an average daily cost per inmate of $396, or $144,635 on an annual basis.
The three primary detention facilities meet different needs among the adult incarcerated population.
MDF is located in downtown Martinez, easily accessible to both courthouses. It is a maximum-security facility that provides intake for all individuals arrested in the County. The maximum capacity of MDF is 695; the ADP in 2025 was 430 (62% of capacity).
WCDF is a medium-security facility located on the Richmond waterfront. It currently has a maximum capacity of 1,096. In 2025, the ADP at WCDF was 490 (45% of capacity).
MCDF is often referred to as “The Farm.” Built on the side of Mt. Diablo, it is a minimum-security jail with dorm-like facilities capable of housing up to 188 people. The 2025 ADP was 37 (20% of capacity). The site also includes a separate law enforcement training facility
RECOMMENDATIONS
R1. By January 1, 2027, the Board should consider requiring an audit to determine the full costs of adult detention facilities.
R2. Upon completion of the audit and no later than June 30, 2027, the Board should consider directing the auditor to report on the review of the full costs of operating each of the adult detention facilities.
R3. By October 31, 2026, the Sheriff’s Office should consider clarifying in its Quarterly Oversight Report that the detention costs reflect only the Sheriff’s Office costs.
R4. By January 1, 2027, the Board should consider directing the Sheriff’s Office and the County Administrator’s Office to identify a methodology for determining and reporting the full costs of the adult detention facilities operated by Contra Costa County.
R5. By July 1, 2027, the Board should consider directing the Sheriff’s Office to close MCDF.
R6. By December 31, 2026, the Board should consider directing the Sheriff’s Office to collect and report operating cost data separately for each CAF program.
REPORTS 2025-2026
Index
Title
2601
Compliance and Continuity Report
2602
Contra Costa County’s Internal Audit Division: Time for a Transformation
2603
BART Office of Inspector General: Independence Delayed is Independence Denied
2604
Pinole’s Financial Future: It’s a Rough Road
2605
Electronic Home Detention
2606
The Cost of Adult Detention Facilities
The Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury is annually impaneled to investigate city and county governments, special districts and certain nonprofit corporations to ensure functions are performed in a lawful, economical and efficient manner. Recommendations resulting from these investigations are listed.
In accordance with Section 933(c) of the California Penal Code, the governing body of a public agency or its designated administrator must respond to these recommendations to the presiding judge within ninety (90) days; and elected officials must respond to the recommendations within sixty (60) days. These responses are a matter of public record and are available, upon request, from the clerk of the Superior Court.
For more information: Click Here
The post Contra Costa County Grand Jury Releases 6 Reports appeared first on Contra Costa News.